Is Your Smart Building an Easy Target for Hackers?
By Coleman Wolf, CPP, CISSP, SmartScore AP
The Introduction of Intelligent Buildings
Advancements in smart building technology have transformed the day-to-day management of buildings. Nearly every aspect of a facility can now be controlled remotely through a series of interconnected sensors and actuators via computers. Operational technology (OT) systems such as building automation systems (BAS), air quality monitoring, elevators, building access control, video surveillance, and more can now be monitored and controlled remotely. Today more than ever, building owners, operators, and tenants expect their facilities to be safe, secure, and more productive while also enhancing occupant experiences through the optimization of space, systems, and services.
We are currently emerging into an evolving, post-pandemic workplace that demands greater monitoring and control of indoor air quality (IAQ), detailed awareness of occupancy as people interact with the different spaces, and enhanced control of facility access. Furthermore, these modern intelligent building systems also help prepare properties to address new health threats as well as future environmental sustainability requirements through increased data collection, analysis, and control.
The age of the intelligent building is upon us, and as intelligent building platforms continue to grow and evolve, so too will the frequency and nature of the cyberattacks we can expect to see targeting these systems.
Where to Look for Unexpected Vulnerabilities
Early building control systems were not typically built with strong security in mind. They tended to be self-contained systems isolated from external access, and it would take some type of physical contact to compromise them. A workstation login and password often were all that was really needed. With modern buildings increasingly being connected with the outside world, exposure to those systems has grown exponentially leading to an increased danger of cyberattacks.
However, the potential impact on building control systems like lighting, lobby monitor displays, thermostats, and other less obvious targets may not always be recognized. While the direct effect on those systems may be relatively minor, the larger ramifications may be much more serious, and the compromise of those devices may not be the ultimate goal of an attacker. The fact that those devices are easy to connect to and likely have vulnerabilities that are easy to exploit makes them valuable initial steps for an attacker to gain further access to a network to reach other targets. If an attacker finds that other entry points to a network are well secured, they will look to alternate entry points, and with OT systems increasingly connected to networks those attackers are finding that they often provide a path with much easier access.
The attacker’s goals may be theft of valuable information, but it could also be some sort of disruption of systems or operations. With IT systems this disruption may be in the form of deleted or modified data, denial-of-service, or it could be ransomware in which data is encrypted until the victim pays a ransom to the attacker. With OT systems, the nature of these disruptions can be significantly more severe. Imagine the potential damage resulting from loss of critical OT systems in a hospital, or power at a casino, or cooling at a data center. And for many systems, availability and integrity is important to the health and safety of personnel adding further potential risks.
As an example of a recently reported cyberattack, hackers were able to gain access to an unnamed Las Vegas casino database via an internet-connected “smart thermometer” used to maintain a high-tech aquarium in their lobby. The breach of this seemingly innocuous device allowed the cybercriminals to bypass security measures and navigate to other systems to steal 10 gigabytes of information from a “high roller” database. The unusual heist highlights the vulnerability of Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices. According to IOT Analytics, the number of connected IoT gadgets is expected to grow 18 percent this year to 14.4 billion devices globally. The trend also underscores the increased vulnerabilities property owners and cybersecurity professionals face.
Limiting Access and Opportunity
While data theft such as theft of financial or other personal information often gets the most attention, there are other threats that can be just as costly and potentially more dangerous. The reliability of systems that control and monitor facility operations is also needed. The continual collection of information by connected devices about our individual environments and activities could also seriously impact how business and personal decisions are made. Fortunately, we are starting to see better protection measures, although there is still a long way to go.
While different systems have different requirements, the following are some basic security recommendations to better protect your building and operations:
Creating a Cybersecurity Action Plan
As information technology (IT) and OT systems become increasingly intertwined, it is clear a unified approach to security is needed. But the frequent question asked is “who should manage cybersecurity for these systems?”
According to an ASIS survey, the biggest obstacle slowing organizations to adapt to combined systems revolve around people issues. Physical security departments are often set in a history of siloed traditions and functions. Personnel are often hesitant to give up or share control of what they consider to be core competencies including people management, intelligence, and investigations. IT professionals can be equally rooted in their own routines built around the latest technology, system innovations, and cyberthreats.
Loss of authority, status, control, or staff are equally feared by both groups and often results in a lack of communication. This often leads to the two sides not recognizing security gaps or worse, assuming the other is addressing specific concerns. Despite these hesitations, many companies are beginning to understand that both OT and IT systems need to be managed holistically under the overall goal of risk management. Communication is fundamental to successful convergence.
In many instances, IT is the gatekeeper to all devices allowed on a company’s network. Bringing IT and OT stakeholders together early in the project design development process – preferably during initial Master Planning phases – can help avoid conflicts and eliminate implementation schedule delays. While it is common for organizations to put their intelligent building system and individual OT system components on the company’s enterprise network, it comes with inherent cybersecurity risk. If devices are not thoroughly vetted, tested, and approved by IT, chances are they will not be allowed to connect, potentially leading to missed expectations and lost operational opportunities.
In the end, being more integrated and interconnected does not inherently mean your facility is more vulnerable, but it does make the security considerations more complex. In fact, the additional systems can actually make building automation systems (BAS) safer if they provide more detailed intelligence that allow operations personnel to respond to a cyberattack more accurately and efficiently. And if the integration of these devices and systems drives more and better engagement between stakeholders, we can expect to see overall better security, improved operations, reduced utility consumption, and increased occupant comfort, delivering on the promise of the intelligent building.
Cybersecurity is a journey, not a destination.
Implementing a successful cybersecurity risk management plan is a cycle that begins with awareness and works through implementation before starting over again. In addition to engaging a qualified third-party expert to help guide you along the way as well as conduct independent assessments, there are two specific steps every company should take now:
Get your IT and OT teams together now
Know your security posture
Coleman Wolf shares his knowledge from over 25 years of security management and security engineering experience to promote ESD’s mission to improve society through the built environment.
Contact ESD’s experts for more information on how ESD can help with building automation and cybersecurity.
Improved building system technology is making today’s smart buildings safer, more energy efficient, and more attractive to tenants. But ESD, now Stantec Studio Leader and Senior Security Consultant Coleman Wolf says building automated system (BAS) improvements could come with new vulnerabilities. (Read more about intelligent building security.)
Protecting your company assets from physical and cyber threats is an ongoing battle. ESD, now Stantec Studio Leader and Senior Security Consultant Coleman Wolf will be offering his assessment of the front lines when he presents at the upcoming Global Security Exchange (GSX) conference in Dallas, Texas. (Learn more about GSX.)
Intelligent building systems make facilities more efficient, reduce carbon emissions, and improve the safety and health of occupants. But ESD, now Stantec Studio Leader for Security Systems Coleman Wolf says these same systems may be making companies more vulnerable to cyber threats. (Read more about protecting assets from hackers.)